« The Case Against Edwards for VP | Main | Kerry Needs Some Tech Help »

The Times Wakes Up?

In the NY Times today:

President Asked Aide to Explore Iraq Link to 9/11

The White House acknowledged Sunday that on the day after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, President Bush asked his top counterterrorism adviser, Richard A. Clarke, to find out whether Iraq was involved.

[...]

The conversation — which the White House suggested last week had never taken place — centers on perhaps the most volatile charge Mr. Clarke has made public in recent days: that the Bush White House became fixated on Iraq and Saddam Hussein at the expense of focusing on Al Qaeda.

In his new book, "Against All Enemies," Mr. Clarke recounts that the president pulled him and several other aides into the White House Situation Room on the evening of Sept. 12, 2001, and instructed them "to go back over everything, everything. See if Saddam did this. See if he's linked in any way."

Mr. Clarke was incredulous, he said in the book. "But, Mr. President, Al Qaeda did this," he said he responded.

Mr. Bush answered: "I know, I know, but . . . see if Saddam was involved. Just look. I want to know any shred," according to Mr. Clarke's account. Mr. Clarke added in later interviews that he felt he was being intimidated to find a link between the attacks and Iraq.

Last week, the White House said it had no record that Mr. Bush had even been in the Situation Room that day and said the president had no recollection of such a conversation. Although administration officials stopped short of denying the account, they used it to cast doubt on Mr. Clarke's credibility as they sought to debunk the charge that the administration played down the threat posed by Al Qaeda in the months before the Sept. 11 attacks and worried instead about Iraq.

(emphasis is mine)

Perhaps the Times might be actually waking up and reporting the news. That the White House says one thing one week and totally makes a 180 the next is news. I'm glad they finally agree. I think the only thing I'd prefer to change is the headline to "White House Admits President Asked Aide to Explore Iraq Link to 9/11", but I guess I might be getting greedy.

I urge you to read the rest of the article as its a decent summary of yesterday's events. Yeah, I cut out Condi's rebuttal with that [...] but its just lies anyway.

Posted on March 29, 2004 12:48 AM

Comments

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.criticalviewer.com/mt-tb.cgi/41